Risk Identification and Project Performance in Libyan Construction Companies: Empirical Evidence from 240 Professionals

• Abdulnasir Abdulrraziq Mohammed Akhrees

  Faculty of Arts and Architecture, University of Derna, Derna, Libya.

  Author

• Saaed Awad Abrabba Saaed

  Faculty of Engineering Technologies, University of Derna, Al-Qubba, Libya

  Author

• Abdulbasit Abdulrhman Abdulraziq Abdulsamea

  Faculty of Engineering Technologies, University of Derna, Al-Qubba, Libya

  Author

• Fathi Alnagi Akreem Mahmoud

  Faculty of Engineering Technologies, University of Derna, Al-Qubba, Libya

  Author

This study examines whether systematic risk identification is associated with project performance in Libyan construction companies. A quantitative, cross-sectional survey was administered to 240 construction professionals selected through convenience sampling. Risk identification and project performance were measured using structured five-point Likert-scale items. Instrument reliability was acceptable for risk identification (Cronbach's alpha = 0.734) and strong for project performance (alpha = 0.888), while the full 27-item instrument reported alpha = 0.969. Pearson correlation and simple linear regression were used to test the proposed relationship. Risk identification was positively and significantly correlated with project performance (r = 0.352, p < 0.001). The regression model was statistically significant, F(1, 238) = 33.711, p < 0.001, and explained 12.4% of the variance in project performance (R-squared = 0.124). The unstandardized coefficient (B = 0.468) indicates that higher reported risk-identification practice predicts higher reported performance. The findings support institutionalizing early and recurring risk registers, cross-functional stakeholder workshops, lessons-learned reviews, and periodic risk updates linked to project decisions. However, the modest explanatory power shows that risk identification is only one component of a wider performance system. Because the design is cross-sectional, self-reported, and based on non-probability sampling, the results establish association and prediction rather than causality and should be interpreted within these methodological limits.

1. Saaed Awad Abrabba Saaed، Faculty of Engineering Technologies, University of Derna, Al-Qubba, Libya

   Risk Identification and Project Performance in Libyan Construction Companies: Empirical Evidence from 240 Professionals

Ahmadi, M., Behzadian, K., Ardeshir, A., & Kapelan, Z. (2016). Comprehensive risk management using fuzzy FMEA and MCDA techniques in highway construction projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 22(4), 467-477. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2015.1068847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2015.1068847

Al-Bahar, J. F., & Crandall, K. C. (1990). Systematic risk management approach for construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 116(3), 533-546. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1990)116:3(533) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1990)116:3(533)

Ali, M., Norman, S. Z., Ghani, E., & Haron, N. (2018). The influence of risk management on construction project performance: A case study. Journal of Social Sciences Research, Special Issue 5, 936-942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.spi5.936.942

Ali, N., Ideris, Z., Alferjany, M. A., & Akram, A. (2023). The effect of risk management practices on project performance: A case study of the Libyan construction industry. Journal of Business Review.

Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023

Batson, R. (2009). Project risk identification methods for construction planning and execution. In Construction Research Congress 2009 (pp. 76-84). American Society of Civil Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1061/41020(339)76 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/41020(339)76

Chileshe, N., & Kikwasi, G. J. (2014). Critical success factors for implementation of risk assessment and management practices within the Tanzanian construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2013-0001

Dziadosz, A., & Rejment, M. (2015). Risk analysis in construction project-chosen methods. Procedia Engineering, 122, 258-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.034

Elhoush, R., & Kulatunga, U. (2017). The effectiveness of project risk management: A study within the Libyan oil and gas industry.

Eybpoosh, M., Dikmen, I., & Birgonul, M. T. (2011). Identification of risk paths in international construction projects using structural equation modeling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(12), 1164-1175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000382

Hillson, D. (2017). Managing risk in projects (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Hillson, D. (2020). Practical project risk management: The ATOM methodology. Management Concepts.

Hughes, M., Tippett, D. D., & Thomas, W. K. (2004). Measuring project success in the construction industry. Engineering Management Journal, 16(3), 36-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2004.11415255

Idris, M. H., Adnan, H., Baharuddin, H. E. A., Zaki, Z. A. M., & Ismail, W. N. W. (2022). Risk factors on civil engineering projects. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1067(1), 012064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1067/1/012064

Kumar, A., & Sood, H. (2023). A study of risk management approaches in construction projects in Bihar. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, 11(7), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.54304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.54304

Odimabo, O., Oduoza, C., & Suresh, S. (2018). An insight into the process, tools, and techniques for construction risk management. IntechOpen. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.79459

Salleh, F., Palaniappan, S., Theng, I. L. P., Helmi, H. N. M., & Kassim, N. M. (2018). A review on risk management implementation in the construction industry. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology.

Saminu, S., Prasad, R., & Thamilarasu, V. (2015). A study of various factors affecting risk management techniques in construction projects: A case study of India. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 4(3), 519-523. https://doi.org/10.15623/IJRET.2015.0403098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2015.0403098

Sanda, Y. N., Anigbogu, N., Izam, Y. D., & Datukun, H. L. (2021). Developing questionnaire for postgraduate studies in construction management. Journal of Surveying, Construction & Property, 12(1), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.22452/jscp.vol12no1.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22452/jscp.vol12no1.2

Tadayon, M., Jaafar, M., & Nasri, E. (2012). An assessment of risk identification in large construction projects in Iran. Journal of Construction Management, 14(1), 34-43.

• PDF (الإنجليزية)

هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.